tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22451554.post3073323102767893763..comments2008-04-06T19:18:48.044-04:00David J. Fianderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08649853579641241634david@fiander.infoBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22451554.post-83528918634922954002008-04-06T19:18:00.000-04:002008-04-06T19:18:00.000-04:00ILL is just part of the picture. How about Journal Citation Reports, the titles we already own in print, and when (or if) we canceled the print.David J. Fianderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08649853579641241634noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22451554.post-23542096650085600632008-04-06T19:03:00.000-04:002008-04-06T19:03:00.000-04:00Hey, sounds like you were going through the same exercise I was going through over the last few weeks - with the same thoughts. Reading through a list of journal article requests per quarter is not the most efficient way to identify the potential value of additions to your collection. Even CSV would help!<BR/><BR/>To be fair, I just received access last week to the reporting application myself, so perhaps I can pull something more munge-friendly out of the system.Dan Scotthttp://coffeecode.netnoreply@blogger.com